Sorry, GLAAD, But GlambertGate Is About Homophobia

More GlambertGate talk?  I know, I know.  I hate to sound like some radical leftist gay who turns everything into a rant against white patriarchal heteronormativity:

You: Isn’t this blog usually more funny?


But c’mon, it’s fair to argue that the whole situation with Adam Lambert and ABC is the result of some sort of pop-culture gay panic, and–regardless of the deciding factor in ABC’s decision to cancel Lambert’s future appearance on the network–it’s important to discuss what this particular moment says about artistic expression and gay acceptance in mainstream media.  That, and the whole debacle’s becoming a first-class shit show.

First off, there’s this:

Since no moment in popular culture to involve a homosexual is complete without a statement from GLAAD, the Los Angeles Times reported yesterday that GLAAD had the following words to contribute:

It would appear that the kiss between Adam Lambert and his keyboardist did not factor into ABC’s decision. ABC has a history of positive gay and transgender inclusion that includes featuring kisses between gay and lesbian couples on-air. We applaud the visibility of openly gay performers and congratulate Adam Lambert for sharing his story on ‘The Ellen DeGeneres Show’ this week as well as his upcoming appearance on ‘The Jay Leno Show.’

This, it should be noted, was part of a joint statement with ABC, which had this to say:

Given the live nature of the American Music Awards, Adam Lambert’s performance, which differed greatly from his rehearsal, caught many, including the network, off guard. This is not a question of Lambert’s sexual orientation. As is evidenced by GLAAD’s media report card, ABC is at the forefront of positive gay and lesbian portrayal on television. We welcome openly gay performers and look forward to continuing our great work within the LGBT community.

ABC may have cancelled Adam Lambert’s future appearances, but they didn’t do it because he’s gay, so homophobia couldn’t be playing any part in this circus whatsoever.  And besides, there’s that great report card, which is like how you can’t be racist if you’ve got black friends. If they both say so, it obviously must be true!

Naturally the cancellation couldn’t have anything to do with, say, Liberty Council’s FCC complaint.  Particularly when said organization is closely associated with the late Rev. Jerry Falwell, and most definitely when its director of cultural affairs explained their motivation to the Los Angeles Times as such:

The issue is not so much about homosexuality, although I believe the preponderance of Americans find public hyper-sexualized acts of homosexuality particularly off-putting.  But the issue was more of indecency and what is decency. And frankly the issue is one of law. We believe this performance met the threshold for violation of federal law and violation of FCC regulations. And the Supreme Court has held time and again that there’s not a First Amendment right to engage in public indecency as evidenced by the outcry and complaints that poured into ABC. We believe that this violated contemporary community standards in terms of what is and what isn’t decent.

Nope, no homophobia here!  Their claims of indecency are 100% legitimate because people don’t want to witness anything that’s hyper-sexualized AND gay.  That’s not bigotry, people.  That’s just maintaining some standards of decency!

And what about Kara DioGuardi’s sage wisdom that ABC’s move is all about appeasing advertisers?  Well any viewers (and the accompanying ad revenue) lost from future appearances of that dirty, filthy Adam Lambert could never in any way be accused of being homophobes.

Oh wait.  We already did.

I sincerely appreciate that GLAAD exists as an organization to help the GLBT community have a voice in mainstream media, but I don’t like the fact that they’re speaking on our behalf yet refusing to address the very big and very pink elephant in the room.  ABC doesn’t have to cancel Adam Lambert’s appearances because he’s gay to make this situation a homophobic one.  No, their decision gives credence to the bigoted opinions of critics like Liberty Council and the ignorant audience that would cost ABC ads because the mere thought of Adam Lambert repulses them.  That is what makes about homophobia, and that is what puts ABC in the wrong, and that is why it’s such an embarrassment to see GLAAD so willingly co-sign this decision.

There are no comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: